Limiting National Monuments

House Roll Call Vote 495

1997 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

229

Votes Against

197

Not Voting

7

The Antiquities Act is an effective tool for protecting our nation’s natural heritage as well as historical, scenic, and scientific resources. Signed into law in 1906 by President Theodore Roosevelt, the Act gives the President the authority to take swift action to protect significant federal lands and resources from imminent threats of exploitation such as logging, mining, oil drilling, and commercial development. Since enactment, 13 Presidents, from both political parties, have used the Act to proclaim 105 national monuments in order to protect outstanding historic, scientific, and scenic objects on federal lands. Many of these monuments were later designated by Congress as national parks, including Grand Canyon, Olympic, Joshua Tree, Acadia, Capitol Reef, Death Valley, Glacier Bay, and Denali. In the past 50 years the law has been used sparingly. Just 21 monument proclamations have been issued since 1943.

In September 1996, President Clinton declared 1.7 million acres in southern Utah as the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, to protect the area from a proposed massive mining operation, among other threats. The area has been considered for special protection for many years. Some western Members of Congress were angered by the President’s action and, rather than exercise Congress’ authority to reverse the specific Utah monument designation, responded by proposing broad limits to the President’s authority to proclaim national monuments.

H.R. 1127, sponsored by Parks Subcommittee Chairman Jim Hansen (R-UT), would prohibit the President from unilaterally and rapidly designating a national monument larger than 50,000 acres, an arbitrary acreage limit that bears no relationship to the amount of land deserving protection and is smaller than most prior monuments. Before declaring a monument over 50,000 acres, H.R. 1127 requires the President to notify the governor of the state in which the federal land is located and allow 30 days for the state to comment. In addition, any monument established by the President would expire after two years unless Congress expressly approves the monument designation. These procedures and Congressional oversight would eliminate the President’s current ability to provide threatened lands and resources with immediate protection. Environmental groups fought the legislation, believing that it would prevent important federal resources from being protected in the future, and would allow powerful Members of Congress to frustrate nationally significant land protection efforts.

On October 7, 1997, the House passed H.R. 1127, 229 -197. NO is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%