Population Funding

1992 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

157

Votes Against

276

Issues

World population is now 5.5 billion. Given the exponential rate of world population growth which added 97 million people in the past year alone, action taken this decade to stem growth will determine whether the Earth’s population nearly doubles or quadruples in the next century. Nearly half those living in the developing world will enter their reproductive years within the next 25 years. If we make a concerted effort now, world population should peak near 8 billion. If we fail to act now, it will continue to soar to 20 billion or more.

Implementation of the United Nations Amsterdam Declaration, endorsed by 79 countries, including the United States in 1989, would help hold world population relatively stable at 8 billion by making voluntary family planning universally available by the year 2000. The US needs to target 4% of its foreign aid budget to population assistance to realize this goal. In the past two years, the US significantly increased its contribution to international population programs from $270 million to $325 million. Turrung the corner on the problem, however, will require even larger increases in the future.

A formal letter written by Representatives Tony Beilenson (D CA-23) and Peter Kostmayer (D PA-8) to the Foreign Operations Subcommittee Chairman David Obey (D WI-7) requested an increase to $650 million in FY 93 for international population assistance. The letter was sent to Chairman Obey on May 22, prior to votes in the Subcommittee on FY 93 appropriations. The Subcommittee approved S410 million. This represents a slight improvement over last year’s appropriations bill; in a year when the overall foreign aid bill was decreased significantly, the environmental community applauds the Appropriations Subcommittee’s increase in population funding.

Combating population growth is one of the most vital and farsighted efforts we can undertake, and an increase in funding now will save many times the expense in future foreign assistance. Environmentalists consider co-signing on the Beilenson-Kostmayer letter to be a strong pro-environment action. The letter was signed by 160 Members of Congress.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%