California Water Resources

House Roll Call Vote 436

2016 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

181

Votes Against

248

Not Voting

3

Representative Jerry McNerney (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 5538, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, which would remove ideological riders that would weaken protections for fish, birds, and other wildlife in California’s Bay-Delta. These provisions would undermine the Endangered Species Act, jeopardizing populations of salmon and other local fisheries, they would threaten the habitat of millions of birds by undermining the water rights of wildlife refuges, and they would put at risk thousands of jobs that rely on a healthy Bay-Delta. The rider would also have ramifications across other western states, including reducing public input and review of water projects, lowering funding for the Bureau of Reclamation, and limiting states’ and the federal government’s ability to manage and protect water resources. These dangerous provisions prioritize the interests of large agribusinesses and use California’s drought as an excuse to weaken federal and state environmental laws. On July 13, the House rejected the McNerney amendment by a vote of 181-248 (House roll call vote 436). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 5538 on July 14, but the Senate took no action on this legislation.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2016 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2016 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2016 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2016 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2016 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2016 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2016 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2016 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2016 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2016 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2016 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2016 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2016 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2016 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2016 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2016 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2016 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2016 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2016 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2016 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2016 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2016 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2016 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2016 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2016 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2016 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2016 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2016 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2016 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2016 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2016 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2016 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2016 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2016 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2016 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2016 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2016 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2016 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2016 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2016 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2016 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2016 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2016 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2016 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2016 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2016 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2016 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2016 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2016 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2016 State Scorecard Average

3%