Fossil Fuel Research

House Roll Call Vote 282

1999 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

Yes

Votes For

248

Votes Against

169

Not Voting

17

The burning of fossil fuels is one of the world’s major sources of pollution, producing the nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide that, in turn, contribute to smog and global warming. Yet the Department of Energy, through its Fossil Fuel Research and Development program, continues to spend money on technologies to produce, refine, and burn fossil fuels such as coal, rather than on exploring the use of cleaner fuels and technologies. 

During consideration of the Fiscal Year 2000 Interior appropriations bill, two amendments were introduced to cut portions of the $280 million earmarked for the Energy Department’s fossil fuel program. Representatives Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Ron Lewis (R-KY), James Oberstar (D- MN), and Bart Stupak (D-MI) offered an amendment to cut $50 million from the program. Part of the savings would be used to compensate local governments that have federally-owned land in their jurisdictions for “lost” tax revenues through the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program. In addition, Representatives James McGovern (D-MA), Tom Campbell (R-CA), Joseph Hoeffel (D-PA), and Rush Holt (D-NJ) offered an amendment to transfer $29 million from the fossil fuel program to the Land and Water Conservation Fund (see House vote 4). On July 13, 1999, the House passed the Sanders amendment 248–169. YES is the pro-environment vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%