Attacking the Clean Water Restoration Rule

House Roll Call Vote 142

2023 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

227

Votes Against

198

Not Voting

5

Chair Sam Graves (R-MO) sponsored H.J. Res. 27, a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution of disapproval, which would repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) final “Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United States (WOTUS)’” rule, also known as the Clean Water Restoration Rule. The CRA is an extreme and blunt tool that is being used by anti-environmental members of Congress who want to permanently strip away protections for our environment, communities, wildlife, and natural heritage. This legislation would jeopardize our water resources by invalidating the Biden-Harris administration’s rule to ensure that critical waters, from small streams to rivers to wetlands, are protected from unregulated pollution and destruction when they have important downstream effects on water quality. H.J. Res. 27 would also prevent future administrations from issuing rules that are “substantially the same,” which could undermine future agency action to the benefit of polluters. This attack on our clean water safeguards puts the profits of polluters ahead of the health and safety of our families and communities, especially low-wealth communities and communities of color who are disproportionately impacted by water pollution. On March 9, the House approved H.J. Res. 27 by a vote of 227-198 (House roll call vote 142). On March 29, the Senate approved H.J. Res. 27; however on April 6, the president vetoed it and on April 18, the House failed to override the president’s veto.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2023 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2023 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2023 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2023 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2023 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2023 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2023 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2023 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2023 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2023 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2023 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2023 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2023 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2023 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2023 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2023 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2023 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2023 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2023 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2023 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2023 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2023 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%