Celebrate Earth Day: Become a Sustaining Member! Join LCV Today

Establishing Anti-Environment and Anti-Democracy House Rules

House Roll Call Vote 23

2023 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

219

Votes Against

213

Not Voting

1

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) sponsored H.Res. 5, a resolution adopting the rules of the House of Representatives for the 118th Congress and for other purposes, which, in addition to organizing the chamber for the new Congress, imposed strict budget cuts on future appropriations. The provision capped spending at Fiscal Year 2022 levels, which would translate into a 22% cut for environmental programs from FY23 levels thereby undermining critical agency staffing and funding for programs that address the legacy of toxic pollution and the climate crisis. The rules package also removed a provision that required land transfers to be budget neutral, making it easier to give away our nation’s public lands. At a time of significant concern about the influence of polluters and other special interests in politics, and just two years after an insurrection that some House members supported, this package also hobbled the bipartisan Office of Congressional Ethics by imposing arbitrary term limits to eject Democratic ethics board members and effectively prohibiting it from hiring new staff, making it much harder to hold unethical officials accountable. On January 9, the House approved H.Res. 5 by a vote of 220-213 (House roll call vote 23). The House approves its own rules package and it takes effect immediately upon passage, though the rules may be, and often are, waived by a majority vote.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

Alaska
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Arizona
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Arkansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

California
2025 State Scorecard Average

78%

Colorado
2025 State Scorecard Average

51%

Connecticut
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Delaware
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2025 State Scorecard Average

28%

Georgia
2025 State Scorecard Average

34%

Hawaii
2025 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Illinois
2025 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

22%

Iowa
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Kansas
2025 State Scorecard Average

23%

Kentucky
2025 State Scorecard Average

19%

Louisiana
2025 State Scorecard Average

38%

Maine
2025 State Scorecard Average

76%

Maryland
2025 State Scorecard Average

85%

Massachusetts
2025 State Scorecard Average

99%

Michigan
2025 State Scorecard Average

44%

Minnesota
2025 State Scorecard Average

50%

Mississippi
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Missouri
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Montana
2025 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2025 State Scorecard Average

3%

Nevada
2025 State Scorecard Average

69%

New Hampshire
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

New Jersey
2025 State Scorecard Average

73%

New Mexico
2025 State Scorecard Average

93%

New York
2025 State Scorecard Average

72%

North Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

26%

North Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2025 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Oregon
2025 State Scorecard Average

82%

Pennsylvania
2025 State Scorecard Average

47%

Rhode Island
2025 State Scorecard Average

97%

South Carolina
2025 State Scorecard Average

14%

South Dakota
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2025 State Scorecard Average

10%

Texas
2025 State Scorecard Average

31%

Utah
2025 State Scorecard Average

1%

Vermont
2025 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

58%

Washington
2025 State Scorecard Average

75%

West Virginia
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2025 State Scorecard Average

25%

Wyoming
2025 State Scorecard Average

0%