Halting Protections for the Northern Long-Eared Bat

House Roll Call Vote 382

2023 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

220

Votes Against

209

Not Voting

2

Issues

The House considered Senator Markwayne Mullin’s (R-OK) S.J. Res. 24, a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution of disapproval, which would repeal the Fish and Wildlife Service’s (FWS) rule protecting the northern long-eared bat under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The CRA is an extreme and blunt tool that is being used by anti-environmental members of Congress who want to permanently strip away protections for our environment, communities, wildlife, and natural heritage. This resolution could prevent any future protection of the northern long-eared bat, even if the population collapsed or just a handful of individual bats remained and, simply put, could be a vote to condemn that species to extinction. Coming just months after the Senate’s similarly precedent-breaking votes on S.J. Res. 9 and 24, this would be only the second time in the CRA’s 30-year history that the House attempted to use the law to rescind ESA protections for an individual species. On July 27, the House approved S.J. Res. 24 by a vote of 220-209 (House roll call vote 382). On May 11, the Senate approved S.J. Res. 24; however, the president vetoed it on September 26, and on September 28, the Senate failed to override the president’s veto.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2023 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2023 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2023 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2023 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2023 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2023 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2023 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2023 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2023 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2023 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2023 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2023 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2023 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2023 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2023 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2023 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2023 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2023 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2023 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2023 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2023 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2023 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%