Rescinding Protections for the Lesser Prairie-Chicken

House Roll Call Vote 381

2023 Scorecard Vote

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

220

Votes Against

206

Not Voting

5

Issues

The House considered Senator Roger Marshall’s (R-KS) S.J. Res. 9, a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution of disapproval, which would repeal the Fish and Wildlife Service’s (FWS) rule protecting lesser prairie-chickens under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The CRA is an extreme and blunt tool that is being used by anti-environmental members of Congress who want to permanently strip away protections for our environment, communities, wildlife, and natural heritage. In this case, use of the CRA could prevent FWS from ever protecting the lesser prairie-chicken under the ESA in the future, even if the populations collapsed or just a handful of individual birds remained. These CRA resolutions will significantly harm efforts to protect endangered species and the ESA itself. Alarmingly, this was the first time in the CRA’s 30-year history that the House attempted to use the law to rescind ESA protections for an individual species. On July 27, the House approved S.J. Res. 9 by a vote of 221-206 (House roll call vote 381). The Senate approved S.J. Res. 9 on May 3; however, the president vetoed it on September 26, and on September 28, the Senate failed to override the president’s veto.

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Excused
  • Not Applicable

Vote Key

Sort by
Alabama
2023 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2023 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2023 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2023 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2023 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2023 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2023 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2023 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2023 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2023 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2023 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2023 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2023 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2023 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2023 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2023 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2023 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2023 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2023 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2023 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2023 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2023 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%