Undermining International Action on Climate

House Roll Call Vote 500

2023

Pro-environment vote

No

Votes For

216

Votes Against

212

Not Voting

5

Representative Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) sponsored H.R.4665, the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2024, which would undermine our progress on fighting the climate crisis at home and abroad. At a time where the United States should be doing more, not less, in the global fight against climate change, this bill provides no funding for programs designed to directly address climate change and its impacts, and explicitly prohibits funding from being used to implement the Paris Climate Agreement and other important multilateral institutions like the Green Climate Fund, the Clean Technology Fund, and for loss and damage. It also prohibits funding being used for climate change-focused executive orders, and for the Special Envoy on Climate. It rescinds over $11 billion from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, includes troubling provisions on environmental review and permitting for cross-border projects, and seeks to undercut US authority to regulate cross-border pipelines, including in ongoing State Department negotiations with Canada on Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline. On September 28, the House approved H.R.4665 by a vote of 216-212 (House roll call vote 500). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate did not consider this legislation or any Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations bill on the floor in 2023

Votes

Show
Show
Export data (CSV)
  • Pro-environment vote
  • Anti-environment Vote
  • Missed Vote
  • Not Applicable
Sort by
Alabama
2023 State Scorecard Average

15%

Alaska
2023 State Scorecard Average

58%

Arizona
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Arkansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

California
2023 State Scorecard Average

75%

Colorado
2023 State Scorecard Average

52%

Connecticut
2023 State Scorecard Average

97%

Delaware
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Florida
2023 State Scorecard Average

30%

Georgia
2023 State Scorecard Average

35%

Hawaii
2023 State Scorecard Average

98%

Idaho
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Illinois
2023 State Scorecard Average

81%

Indiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Iowa
2023 State Scorecard Average

5%

Kansas
2023 State Scorecard Average

25%

Kentucky
2023 State Scorecard Average

20%

Louisiana
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Maine
2023 State Scorecard Average

71%

Maryland
2023 State Scorecard Average

83%

Massachusetts
2023 State Scorecard Average

96%

Michigan
2023 State Scorecard Average

54%

Minnesota
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

Mississippi
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Missouri
2023 State Scorecard Average

21%

Montana
2023 State Scorecard Average

2%

Nebraska
2023 State Scorecard Average

4%

Nevada
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

New Hampshire
2023 State Scorecard Average

88%

New Jersey
2023 State Scorecard Average

78%

New Mexico
2023 State Scorecard Average

94%

New York
2023 State Scorecard Average

63%

North Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

47%

North Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Ohio
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Oklahoma
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%

Oregon
2023 State Scorecard Average

68%

Pennsylvania
2023 State Scorecard Average

56%

Rhode Island
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

South Carolina
2023 State Scorecard Average

17%

South Dakota
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Tennessee
2023 State Scorecard Average

13%

Texas
2023 State Scorecard Average

33%

Utah
2023 State Scorecard Average

6%

Vermont
2023 State Scorecard Average

100%

Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

55%

Washington
2023 State Scorecard Average

72%

West Virginia
2023 State Scorecard Average

0%

Wisconsin
2023 State Scorecard Average

24%

Wyoming
2023 State Scorecard Average

3%